Taş Tepeler

Taş Tepeler / News / Karahan Tepe's Structure AB was built to be walked through

What the excavators say · Karahan Tepe · 4 August 2026

Karahan Tepe's Structure AB was built to be walked through

The small room at Karahan Tepe known as Structure AB was not made to be looked at from outside — it was made to be entered. Necmi Karul describes a space you climb down into, cross past ten phallic pillars and a watching carved head, and leave by a second stair: architecture built around a rite of passage.

Karahan Tepe's Structure AB was built to be walked through
Structure AB at Karahan Tepe: the pillars left standing in the rock, a porthole opening through to the great Structure AD, and the human head carved into the wall. Photo: Karahan Tepe / Taş Tepeler project archive.

tobeytravels, Structure AB, Pillars Shrine with Porthole Window to AD and Carved Head, Karahantepe (Karahan Tepe), Turkey, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

A room you go down into

Most of what makes Karahan Tepe famous — the carved heads, the phallic pillars, the seated figures — gets photographed one object at a time, as if the site were a gallery of things to look at. Prof. Necmi Karul, who directs the excavation and coordinates the wider Taş Tepeler project, describes one building in a way that resists that habit. Structure AB only makes sense as a space you move through.

In the project's own account, AB sits directly against the huge central building, Structure AD, and is cut down into the bedrock — a room roughly 7 by 6 metres and about 3.5 metres deep. You reach it by a staircase down from AD, and at the far end there is a second staircase, probably for leaving. Entrance at one end, exit at the other: the plan builds a route into the architecture.

What is waiting inside

Along one long wall, a human head is carved directly into the bedrock, facing into the room. Opposite it stand ten pillars left in place when the rest of the rock was cut away — pillars shaped, in Karul's description, like phalluses, ranging from about a metre to over one and a half metres tall.

There is also water, or the memory of it. A serpentine channel cut into the surface runs obliquely into the room, and a small opening where AB meets AD would have let liquid be poured through into a pit inside the larger building. Karul reads this as the trace of a rite involving liquid — something enacted, not merely stored.

Architecture as an experience, not a display

Put the pieces in sequence and AB stops being a set of objects and becomes a choreographed passage: descend from the great hall, cross a narrow room lined with phallic pillars and watched by a carved face, past a channel where liquid was poured, and climb out the other side. You do not view this building. You submit to it.

Karul interprets AB, on those grounds, as a building tied to rites of passage — most likely puberty or initiation rituals, the kind of transition that ethnography shows is used to fold an individual into the community. Whether or not that specific reading holds, the architectural point is hard to dispute: the room was designed to be moved through in a particular order, by a body, for an occasion.

Why it matters

It reframes what a Neolithic 'monument' is. AB was not raised to be seen across the landscape; it was sunk into the rock to be experienced from inside, in sequence, probably by a few people at a time. Karahan Tepe's builders were not only carving images — they were engineering situations.

That lines up with what the region's other flagship building tells us. At Sayburç the reliefs were cut into the front of a bench people sat on, made to be read at close range by a group inside a room. Different site, same instinct: these spaces were staged for the body, not for the postcard.

What is uncertain

The initiation / rite-of-passage reading is an interpretation built from the architecture and from ethnographic analogy, not something the stones prove on their own; the 'liquid ritual' is inferred from the channel and the opening between the buildings. The dimensions and layout are the excavation's own account and may be refined as work continues.

Much of the framing here comes from Karul's project statements and lecture and interview material, alongside his published writing on Karahan Tepe. Treat it as the director's considered reading — spoken positions may be refined in print.

Sources

  1. Taş Tepeler (official project) — Karahantepe, site description by Necmi Karul
  2. Anadolu Agency — Human depictions, 3D sculptures of Karahantepe site to shed light on history

Follow the digs

New finds from the Taş Tepeler sites, a few times a year — join the list.

Explore the sites →

Last reviewed 9 September 2026. Something wrong?